[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 794 online users. [Complete List]
» 5 Member(s) | 789 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatarAvatarAvatar
Avatar

[-]
Latest Threads
[SOLVED] Need ROM for ZH960-MB-V4.1
Last Post: dejanx
2024-05-04 16:44
» Replies: 1
» Views: 188
K107-MB-V4.2
Last Post: Alby
2024-04-24 00:37
» Replies: 0
» Views: 166
[ROM] NEED ROM ZH960-MB-V5.0 MTK 6592
Last Post: sendycat2
2024-04-21 08:57
» Replies: 0
» Views: 128
ZH960 Tablet Bricked
Last Post: luis mar que
2024-03-20 19:52
» Replies: 14
» Views: 9764
Thanks, I've been looking for this for a...
Last Post: StevenRip
2024-02-25 05:00
» Replies: 0
» Views: 103
NEED ROM ZH960-MB-V4.1
Last Post: ery1988
2024-02-21 08:53
» Replies: 18
» Views: 13657
Budget phone choice help needed
Last Post: sabir7272
2024-02-10 06:52
» Replies: 4
» Views: 4246
ZH960-MB-V3.1 SOLVE
Last Post: Pranav1
2023-12-20 20:22
» Replies: 74
» Views: 33706
Need ROM for SONIM XP7S Android 5.1.1
Last Post: Alpa
2023-11-29 22:17
» Replies: 0
» Views: 126
Need rom for X101 Mt6592
Last Post: carencell
2023-11-24 21:30
» Replies: 3
» Views: 2101
Gizbeat 101: Get your MTK6589 MTK6577 MT...
Last Post: Alexia78
2023-11-13 11:28
» Replies: 8
» Views: 22293
Need rom for a tablet with board id "K10...
Last Post: oliver2
2023-10-24 20:23
» Replies: 6
» Views: 5348
How to Connect open public wifi
Last Post: oliverben45
2023-10-24 16:03
» Replies: 11
» Views: 8853
I NEED FILE FOR ITEL MOBILE PHONE AND TO...
Last Post: Meghnad45
2023-10-22 02:38
» Replies: 1
» Views: 1400
NEED Help Bricked my phone.
Last Post: Meghnad45
2023-10-22 02:36
» Replies: 4
» Views: 4818
Introduction
Last Post: ezrahidaya
2023-10-14 14:38
» Replies: 3
» Views: 1318
Needs help to root a china tablet brand ...
Last Post: ezrahidaya
2023-10-14 14:37
» Replies: 1
» Views: 196
Any tips to stay awake?
Last Post: ezrahidaya
2023-10-14 14:35
» Replies: 6
» Views: 5465
Need ROM for china TAb MT6797
Last Post: ezrahidaya
2023-10-14 14:34
» Replies: 1
» Views: 354
need this stock firmware for my tablet M...
Last Post: ramzii888
2023-10-14 02:20
» Replies: 4
» Views: 4530
Encryption Unsuccessful - Reset Android
Last Post: Aakriti
2023-10-13 16:51
» Replies: 3
» Views: 12400
betools
Last Post: egdeim
2023-09-21 12:41
» Replies: 4
» Views: 5032
[Movie Suggestion] Automata with Antonio...
Last Post: GottaGetX
2023-09-07 09:19
» Replies: 3
» Views: 4147





Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
i wont deal with gearbest
#1
had this letter from gearbest asking for very sensitive info

Dear CustomerThanks for your order at GearbestYour order is now ON HOLD , we need to complete this one-time verification.This is a standard anti-fraud check for online payment,please check our website for more details here : [Only registered and activated users can see links Click here to register] will process your order as soon as we receive the payer's ID confirmation.1) 1 color photo of your identity card or passport or driving license.The photo must show clearly, the full name, expiry date, signature and address if applicable.You can hide the date of birth and document number for your privacy.2) 1 credit card photo of the card used for the paymentFor your safety , please just show the cardholder's name,the expiry date and the last 4 numbers.If you have paid with a virtual credit card please us sreenshot of your electronic bills, which shows the card number and details.If you have paid by Paypal,please send the credit card's copy that you have registered in PayPal.Kindly make sure both attachments' size do not exceed 2 MB.Please rest assured that we just want to make sure that this transaction was indeed made by the cardholder.Our goal is to ensure this order's safety for both of us.As we do not wish to delay your order please kindly reply us within 3 business days.We look forward to hearing from you soonPlease feel free to contact us if you have any question, we are happy to help.Thank you very much for your help and understanding. Best Regards.Gearbest Customer Servicehttp://www.gearbest.com/

i just find this strange since ive bought a few things from them and now they introduce this.
i dont and wont trust these anymore.
You like this post
#2
Hey, Will. I went through the same process. I was initially skeptical, just as you are now, because like you say, they didn't require it before. It's a security update on their side as well as on PayPal's. You can blur out sensitive info on the ID and card like they indicated (gave an ID without an address, too). I didn't need to provide any proof about PayPal registration, though. Just verified my card on PayPal and it was good to go.

I'm not forcing you to provide the requirements, just thought I'd share that I didn't get into any issues after doing so.
I asked around about it as well, when I was asked for the info, and seems to be a new protocol for them.
You and WuddaWaste like this post
This man must fall as all men must
The fate of all is always dust
The man who lies will lie no more
When this man lies at...
#3
?!

There is no way in hell I would give ANY vendor, much less one half-way across the planet, this much information.

In fact, I would not even give this much information to law enforcement unless given no choice.

There must be a mistake here. Right?
You and WuddaWaste like this post
#4
like ed says i wouldnt give the police all this info unless in person, innocent or not i wont buy from them again.
You and WuddaWaste like this post
#5
(2015-08-21, 15:16)will65mcmanus Wrote: like ed says i wouldnt give the police all this info unless in person, innocent or not i wont buy from them again.

Dear, I am Evangeline from GearBest, could you give me your order number? I will check for you the reason why we need your ID information. Usually, when order's value amount is too big, shipping address changes, and if you use different User's IDs or Payment IDs, the protection system will be activated. We aims to ensure order's safety. I am sorry for any unpleasant caused.
#6
Did you read this carefully? All it's asking for is an ID with your name and address on it. You can blur out all other personal data (ID #, face, etc...). And a picture of the debit card. Seriously this is no big deal. They have this info anyways from your order, it's just verification.
You like this post
#7
(2015-08-21, 20:50)cookiedough Wrote: Did you read this carefully? All it's asking for is an ID with your name and address on it. You can blur out all other personal data (ID #, face, etc...). And a picture of the debit card. Seriously this is no big deal. They have this info anyways from your order, it's just verification.

It seems a radical amount of information for online verification. Frankly, it is easier to deal with a vendor that does not require jumping through hoops.

A photo of my government issued ID, which includes my signature and "official" address, plus a photo of my credit card to someone who already has my card number... over the internet?

No thanks.

Hopefully it is something specific to a few transactions and not a new way of doing business. I am sure it is the latter.
#8
(2015-08-23, 09:39)edcoolio Wrote:
(2015-08-21, 20:50)cookiedough Wrote: Did you read this carefully? All it's asking for is an ID with your name and address on it. You can blur out all other personal data (ID #, face, etc...). And a picture of the debit card. Seriously this is no big deal. They have this info anyways from your order, it's just verification.

It seems a radical amount of information for online verification. Frankly, it is easier to deal with a vendor that does not require jumping through hoops.

A photo of my government issued ID, which includes my signature and "official" address, plus a photo of my credit card to someone who already has my card number... over the internet?

No thanks.

Hopefully it is something specific to a few transactions and not a new way of doing business. I am sure it is the latter.

I did this for a recent purchase too. It was no trouble. Its fraud prevention.

It's a picture of the card showing you actually have it in hand. With all numbers blurred except the last four. And some ID with your address on it. It takes not even a minute.

Nobody can do anything with that info other than have it help verify you are you. Yes, it's no guarantee it's really you. It's called "hardening". Making it more difficult for someone to defraud you.

I'd rather be dealing with a vendor who's trying making sure its really me.
You and Athos like this post
#9
(2015-08-23, 11:37)DirKNirK Wrote:
(2015-08-23, 09:39)edcoolio Wrote:
(2015-08-21, 20:50)cookiedough Wrote: Did you read this carefully? All it's asking for is an ID with your name and address on it. You can blur out all other personal data (ID #, face, etc...). And a picture of the debit card. Seriously this is no big deal. They have this info anyways from your order, it's just verification.

It seems a radical amount of information for online verification. Frankly, it is easier to deal with a vendor that does not require jumping through hoops.

A photo of my government issued ID, which includes my signature and "official" address, plus a photo of my credit card to someone who already has my card number... over the internet?

No thanks.

Hopefully it is something specific to a few transactions and not a new way of doing business. I am sure it is the latter.

I did this for a recent purchase too. It was no trouble. Its fraud prevention.

It's a picture of the card showing you actually have it in hand. With all numbers blurred except the last four. And some ID with your address on it. It takes not even a minute.

Nobody can do anything with that info other than have it help verify you are you. Yes, it's no guarantee it's really you. It's called "hardening". Making it more difficult for someone to defraud you.

I'd rather be dealing with a vendor who's trying making sure its really me.

Speaking professionally, it is simply an unnecessary risk that there is no reason to take.

Sending an image of any fiscal or governmentally approved identification instrument (blacked out or not) unless required by federal law (like ammunition), for the purposes of a purchase which is already covered via fraud prevention on any major card, is the opposite of the concept of "hardening " from a consumer point of view.

It is, however, correct to state that it is "hardening", but for the vendor rather, not the consumer.

The fiscal onus is on the vendor. Going through this process is to help the vendor, not the consumer, protect themselves from financial fraud.

That being said, if a consumer is comfortable with this situation, then by all means make the purchase!
#10
(2015-08-24, 03:35)edcoolio Wrote:
(2015-08-23, 11:37)DirKNirK Wrote:
(2015-08-23, 09:39)edcoolio Wrote: It seems a radical amount of information for online verification. Frankly, it is easier to deal with a vendor that does not require jumping through hoops.

A photo of my government issued ID, which includes my signature and "official" address, plus a photo of my credit card to someone who already has my card number... over the internet?

No thanks.

Hopefully it is something specific to a few transactions and not a new way of doing business. I am sure it is the latter.

I did this for a recent purchase too. It was no trouble. Its fraud prevention.

It's a picture of the card showing you actually have it in hand. With all numbers blurred except the last four. And some ID with your address on it. It takes not even a minute.

Nobody can do anything with that info other than have it help verify you are you. Yes, it's no guarantee it's really you. It's called "hardening". Making it more difficult for someone to defraud you.

I'd rather be dealing with a vendor who's trying making sure its really me.

Speaking professionally, it is simply an unnecessary risk that there is no reason to take.

Sending an image of any fiscal or governmentally approved identification instrument (blacked out or not) unless required by federal law (like ammunition), for the purposes of a purchase which is already covered via fraud prevention on any major card, is the opposite of the concept of "hardening " from a consumer point of view.

It is, however, correct to state that it is "hardening", but for the vendor rather, not the consumer.

The fiscal onus is on the vendor. Going through this process is to help the vendor, not the consumer, protect themselves from financial fraud.

That being said, if a consumer is comfortable with this situation, then by all means make the purchase!

Also speaking professionally, there's absolutely nothing anyone can do with the info they're requesting. Notta. Especially since they already have it.

All it is is proof it's really you. I did this process too. Takes all of 30 seconds.


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Bad Experience @ Gearbest indtram 1 1,871 2015-09-01, 02:29
Last Post: NexusTrix
  Gearbest? edcoolio 2 2,159 2014-10-19, 03:23
Last Post: edcoolio
  How do YOU deal with your battery? WuddaWaste 0 1,625 2014-02-08, 07:19
Last Post: WuddaWaste

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Tech & Science
[Sci-Am] Cicadas Are Basically Safe for You—And Your Dog—to ...
Last Post: Scientific American
Yesterday 20:00
» Replies: 0
» Views: 6
[Sci-Am] The Threat of a Solar Superstorm Is Growing—And We’...
Last Post: Scientific American
Yesterday 06:40
» Replies: 0
» Views: 15
[Sci-Am] New Pollution Regulations Could Largely Eliminate C...
Last Post: Scientific American
2024-05-04 16:11
» Replies: 0
» Views: 8
[Sci-Am] Extrovert or Introvert: Most People Are Actually Am...
Last Post: Scientific American
2024-05-04 02:50
» Replies: 0
» Views: 8
[Sci-Am] Lemon-Scented Marijuana Compound Reduces Weed’s ‘Pa...
Last Post: Scientific American
2024-05-03 13:20
» Replies: 0
» Views: 12
[Sci-Am] New Interactive Map Shows Where Extreme Heat Threat...
Last Post: macikus
2024-05-03 01:38
» Replies: 1
» Views: 45
[Sci-Am] How Ugandan Tobacco Farmers Inadvertently Spread Ba...
Last Post: Scientific American
2024-05-02 09:12
» Replies: 0
» Views: 23
[Sci-Am] Will the Amazon Rain Forest Help Save the Planet?
Last Post: Scientific American
2024-05-01 19:43
» Replies: 0
» Views: 23
[Sci-Am] The U.S. Spends a Fortune on Beach Sand That Storms...
Last Post: Scientific American
2024-05-01 06:15
» Replies: 0
» Views: 27
[Sci-Am] Could JWST Solve One of Cosmology's Greatest Myster...
Last Post: Scientific American
2024-04-30 03:14
» Replies: 0
» Views: 43
[Sci-Am] How to See the Lunar Far Side Right Here on Earth
Last Post: Scientific American
2024-04-29 13:40
» Replies: 0
» Views: 48
[Sci-Am] How Big a Threat Is Bird Flu?
Last Post: Scientific American
2024-04-29 00:05
» Replies: 0
» Views: 39
[Sci-Am] The Amazon's Record-Breaking Drought Is about More ...
Last Post: Tauma
2024-04-28 22:35
» Replies: 1
» Views: 45
[Sci-Am] FDA Recalls Heart Pumps Linked to Deaths and Injuri...
Last Post: Scientific American
2024-04-28 09:53
» Replies: 0
» Views: 19
[Sci-Am] Deadly African Heat Wave Would Not Have Been Possib...
Last Post: Scientific American
2024-04-27 20:10
» Replies: 0
» Views: 21
[Harvard] Getting ahead of dyslexia
Last Post: Harvard
2024-04-27 06:36
» Replies: 0
» Views: 29
[Sci-Am] Hollywood Should Give Brain Science a Star Turn
Last Post: Scientific American
2024-04-26 17:14
» Replies: 0
» Views: 38
[Sci-Am] Milky Way's 'Sleeping Giant' Black Hole Lurks Shock...
Last Post: Scientific American
2024-04-26 03:48
» Replies: 0
» Views: 53
[Harvard] Why AI fairness conversations must include disable...
Last Post: Harvard
2024-04-25 13:58
» Replies: 0
» Views: 60
[Sci-Am] How a New AI Model Helps Volcanic History Rise from...
Last Post: Scientific American
2024-04-24 23:17
» Replies: 0
» Views: 64
[Sci-Am] Everyone Will Have Fewer Relatives in the Future
Last Post: Scientific American
2024-04-24 09:25
» Replies: 0
» Views: 45
[Sci-Am] The Dark Side of Nostalgia for Wild, Untouched Plac...
Last Post: Scientific American
2024-04-23 19:59
» Replies: 0
» Views: 37
[Harvard] How did you get that frog to float?
Last Post: Harvard
2024-04-23 19:59
» Replies: 0
» Views: 52
[Sci-Am] In Matters of Scientific Debate, Follow the Houdini...
Last Post: Scientific American
2024-04-23 06:34
» Replies: 0
» Views: 34
[Harvard] Lifting a few with my chatbot
Last Post: Harvard
2024-04-23 06:34
» Replies: 0
» Views: 39
[Sci-Am] This Tiny Fish Makes an Ear-Blasting Screech for Lo...
Last Post: Scientific American
2024-04-22 17:01
» Replies: 0
» Views: 36
[Sci-Am] How Plant Intelligence Can Soothe Climate Anxiety
Last Post: Scientific American
2024-04-22 02:57
» Replies: 0
» Views: 50
[Sci-Am] Contributors to Scientific American’s May 2024 Issu...
Last Post: Scientific American
2024-04-21 13:36
» Replies: 0
» Views: 40
[Sci-Am] A ‘Computer’ Built from DNA Can Find Patterns in Ph...
Last Post: Scientific American
2024-04-20 23:27
» Replies: 0
» Views: 70
[Sci-Am] Unraveling the Secrets of This Weird Beetle’s 48-Ho...
Last Post: Scientific American
2024-04-20 09:17
» Replies: 0
» Views: 52
[Sci-Am] We Are Living in the Pyrocene, the Age of Fire that...
Last Post: Scientific American
2024-04-18 16:45
» Replies: 0
» Views: 98
[Harvard] Hate mosquitoes? Who doesn’t? But maybe we shouldn...
Last Post: Harvard
2024-04-18 03:05
» Replies: 0
» Views: 96
[Sci-Am] Why Some People Always Get Lost—And Others Never Do
Last Post: Scientific American
2024-04-17 13:33
» Replies: 0
» Views: 60
[Sci-Am] U.S. Carbon Removal Needs Have a $100-Billion Price...
Last Post: Scientific American
2024-04-16 23:48
» Replies: 0
» Views: 62
[Sci-Am] New Books Help Parents Explain Climate Disasters to...
Last Post: Scientific American
2024-04-16 10:13
» Replies: 0
» Views: 76
[Sci-Am] Renewable Energy Shatters Records in the U.S.
Last Post: Scientific American
2024-04-15 20:19
» Replies: 0
» Views: 84
[Sci-Am] The Dunning-Kruger Effect Shows that People Don’t K...
Last Post: Scientific American
2024-04-15 06:47
» Replies: 0
» Views: 80